theme made by espoirthemes

tpwrtrmnky:

europeanamericanamericans:

tpwrtrmnky:

idk tumblr rap discourse, i think dismissing the political importance of the genre that successfully popularized the slogan “fuck the police” might be unwise

cool should we talk first about the rampant misogyny or the glorification of drug use that has led to the stigmatization of people who take legitimate prescription medications

yeah we can talk about that

these issues are endemic to USAmerican culture and don’t meaningfully trace back to rap in particular. pretending otherwise has obvious motives and “raising concerns” is a low-skill way to mask racism.

there. talk done.

medusaslover:

image

He’s currently having the worst time at disney land

revvethasmythh:

the thing about “I walk into the blade” is that thaisha says it like it’s the simplest, most obvious thing to do. no hesitation. she’s not just standing there and letting julien level his blade at her, through her, but she is also an active participant in this. “i walk into his blade” in an attempt to show comfort to a grieving man she doesn’t even particularly like. it’s extremely illustrative of both who thaisha and julien are as characters, one using literal weaponry to try and stave off attempted comfort in a angry, grief-driven haze, and the other actively ignoring the pain of the blade in order to do what feels right in the moment, even if she can’t stand that man on a good day


Anonymous said:

On anon because I'm a coward. Sorry for the long ask.

I was just wondering if any other ex-antis had anything that helped them work out the cognitive dissonance? Somehow I have two conflicting beliefs that are (allegedly??) core to who I am as a person, these are my unmovable moral values. But unless the core of who I am as a person is "hypocrite whose beliefs don't make sense," that can't possibly be the case.

I don't really think I'd call myself a "proshipper," but I must say I agree with a lot of what they believe. There's never a valid reason to censor things, no matter how immoral it is. Censorship is always less morally correct than whatever is being censored. Also, antis are huge fucking assholes who are miserable to be around. They make fandom not fun. I'm getting really sick of policing what I actually enjoy or having to performing shame well enough to "justify" why I like it. I don't like feeling ashamed of the things I like, and I don't like making other people feel that way either. I'm here to have fun, and on the modern internet of ragebaiting for engagement, you have to be intentional with your fun, or else you won't have any. You have to seek out communities that align with your interests, morals, and values if you want to find that, because the modern internet is specifically designed to not give you that so you'll keep clicking and watching and looking for it forever.

I DESPERATELY want to find a community that doesn't feel like this anti bullshit all the time. You guys look like you're actually having so much fun. People still harass you for what you like sometimes too, but you don't seem so afraid of those people being your friends. Your mutuals. Everyone. I want what you have SO BAD. I want to be part of that. I hate the little voice that's always asking me if whatever I'm making is too niche, too gross, too weird. I know I got it from other fans policing me, and I know I've helped pass that onto others too. I hate it. It feels like Big Brother is always watching me. Making sure I'm having fun right.

But at the same time....

I don't believe you can be a good person and have certain attractions. There's something fundamentally evil about people who are attracted to, say, children, whether they can change that about themselves or not. Simply the fact they experience that attraction almost makes them beyond redemption. And the only kind of person that I find more deplorable than someone who's attracted to children is someone who isn't, but someone who defends them anyway. You cannot be a good person in my eyes as long as you have that attraction, and people who come to their defense are just as bad if not worse.

I judge the moral compass of a creator by their art (but specifically and especially smut) because it tells me what they're attracted to. That's why this doesn't carry over to other kinds of fiction. But we don't go around scrubbing the internet of the paintings of people like John Wayne Gacy, despite him doing significantly more damage to significantly more real people than any of these random artists on Tumblr or AO3 who're being so severely stepped on. The same should be true of this. The art still deserves to exist, no matter how shitty its creator. But I do assume its creator is shitty.

I know I won't find these things in the same community. What I'm looking for is a defining trait of one group, and another of its polar opposite. They're almost mutually exclusive, yet they both feel so crucial. I know the problem I keep running into in these anti communities is a creation of that scrupulosity I believe in so strongly, and the specific reason I didn't feel so pushed out of proship spaces is because you don't find that there.

But... It's like trying to make me believe the sky is green with spots. You can keep saying it and showing me pictures of a green polka-dotted sky but I just know that can't be right, I've seen outside my whole life and it's never been anything but blue. I could maybe understand if you'd said orange or purple like at sunset, but green with spots? You just can't make me believe that, and I don't really think I can either. I don't really know how to reconcile that. Am I just a hypocrite? How do I stop?

olderthannetfic:

Attraction is not action, nonnie.

You aren’t a hypocrite. You’re just operating on faulty information. The piece you’re missing here is that antis and other conservative dickheads love to conflate a bunch of things that are not the same.

In this case, the things being conflated are: People who sexually abuse children, people who are sexually attracted to children, and people who like reading depictions of something like this.

It may surprise you to know that plenty of real life abusers are just committing crimes of opportunity. They don’t suffer from pedophilia and aren’t attracted to children. They’re simply going after the most vulnerable victims they have access to. They’re a stark example of the whole ‘rape is about power, not lust’ thing.

People who suffer from pedophilia, meanwhile, may or may not hurt others. They may or may not like fiction depicting their attraction. Being born with a brain that experiences an unwanted attraction doesn’t automatically make someone a rapist, nonnie.

Do you assume that every straight guy who ogles a hot girl passing by then follows her into the bushes and rapes her? He feels attraction: surely, he must act on it?!

On some level, a lot of people do think like this. It’s an unhealthy thought pattern that is rife in both radfem and fundie circles. Nonnie, do you perhaps have some traces of this lurking, however subconsciously?

As for people who like fiction depicting children sexually, there can be any number of reasons. Attraction to children is very far down the list. Self inserting onto the child is way more common, but it’s a mistake to think that any one reason or even any twenty reasons will give you the whole picture. People’s interest in fiction is complex. Plenty of asexual people enjoy reading about other people having sex. Plenty of monosexuals like reading about the “wrong” gender for their orientation having sex.

Do lesbians who read m/m strike you as Not Real Lesbians™?

Are you actually going to go there, anon?

No, you absolutely cannot tell what people are attracted to by what they like in fiction. You cannot tell their orientation any more than you can tell if they like being slapped during sex or if they actually want to murder people after reading a million murder mysteries.

Antis and other conservatives want this to be true because it makes them feel safe. If some people are born evil and if their fiction tastes reflect this, we can detect all the bad people, shun them, and keep our communities safe.

Unfortunately, there is no surefire way of detecting the bad people and all of this is security theater.

Moral scrupulosity and draconian views about fiction are about an emotional need in you for order and safety. It’s an understandable need. Unfortunately, it has nothing at all to do with how lust or fantasy lives or fiction reading work.

The really terrible thing is that many people trying to fill this emotional need are actually hurting the causes they care so much about. When there is a Correct Behavior that shows that a person is safe, it’s extremely easy for abusers to hide by saying the right words and professing to hate the right things.

The only way to make people safe—children, fellow fans in fandom—is to let go of the security blankie of surefire signs of Evil™ and take life on a case by case basis.

Moral scrupulosity often leads people to be immoral.

It’s a tragic irony.

Maybe it would help to look into sexuality research conducted by people who aren’t religious right think tanks, and not just the stuff on your most hotbutton issue.

I think many people who have been swimming in the conservative waters are shocked to discover how commonplace extremely dark fantasies are and how much of a nothingburger they are if the person with the fantasies doesn’t feel guilty about them.

Antis feel guilty. Religious nuts feel guilty. Lots of people do not. You’ll never know how bizarre, dark, or socially unacceptable their fantasy lives are because a well-adjusted person isn’t going to run around foisting that knowledge on a rando who clearly doesn’t want to know.

This topic comes up regularly around here, and I often share an anecdote about an old boyfriend who turned out to be into M/f rape porn. I had to pry the info out of him. He was a perfectly nice guy. He wasn’t even that into roleplaying those scenarios. It’s just the kind of erotica he liked to read. You do not know when people are into freaky shit because they assume you do not want to hear it.

Women’s rape fantasies are probably the most studied here. Perhaps if you read up on that topic, it would help you let go of your false ideas about fiction’s predictive power without you having to read endlessly about children being hurt.

And all of this is assuming that we actually are talking about the extreme stuff that squicks so many people, including people who are against censorship. You know as well as I that most “pedo” fan stuff that antis scream about is either art where 25-year-olds are drawn in an anime style that some asshole thinks looks young or fic about teenagers having consensual romantic interactions with other teenagers.

If it makes you feel better, the vast, vast majority of “underage” content on AO3 is about teenagers. Many people I knew back in high school were fucking at 14 or 15. It is completely unremarkable that this gets depicted in fiction.

(And if 14 seems shocking and unhealthy to you… well… it’s healthy and normal for many people. Sorry, not sorry.)

Rest assured, nonnie, there is no conflict between your actual core values:

  • Censorship is worse than the alternative, even for disgusting art
  • I want to protect children from harm

You just need to unlearn some fallacies about fiction and people’s fantasy lives.


Anonymous said:

https://olderthannetfic.tumblr.com/post/797550519104258048/on-anon-because-im-a-coward-sorry-for-the-long <- Hello, fellow Nonnie!

So, I was going to reblog that post, but I realized that I don't necessarily want to attach the full thing I'm about to say to my blog in the current political climate because I am a paranoid person. Most people who know me will be able to recognize that this is me, though, and I'd be down to talk if you want. (Just make a side blog and use it to comment if you want to maintain anonymity.)

This is going to be a little bit of a rambling story. (And I want to say off the bat that it will not involve CSA at any point, and pedophilia is not going to come up literally at all. At the end you'll see why I need to hammer that in.)

--

My earliest sexual fantasies are from when I was very young, years before puberty. (This is very normal, as I would learn when I started studying the topic more seriously.) I didn't actually know that's what they were. I remember spending years and years confused about why I kept having these pervasive thoughts. I remember the first time I was old enough to have a physical response and suddenly realizing,
"Oh. That's why."
So, my sexual preferences are baked very deep into me. Nobody taught them to me and I didn't pick them up from any outside sources. I was pretty scrupulous about avoiding stuff my mom didn't me to see and she was very conservative and careful with what she exposed me to, so it's not like I was copying media.

I also had the same opinion you do that there are some preferences and urges that are fundamentally evil: for instance, you might not be a serial killer, but if you have the impulse to murder, that's messed up. Even if you don't act on those impulses, people are naturally moral; if you have desires opposed to natural morality, you're definitionally evil. The examples you gave in your post were on my list of Evil desires. I contrasted this with doing bad things for normal reasons. I figured that most crime was the result of bad circumstance: you bully people because you feel unloved and have low self esteem, you steal because you don't have the money for stuff, that sort of thing. Nobody actually wants to do bad things... so if you do, you're not like a normal criminal who just needs therapy and some community support. You're actually evil.

That's exactly why I did so much intense self-reflection. You see, my baked-in-my-soul sexual preference is for rape. Long before I knew how sex worked, I had fantasies of beating heroes up, holding them down, and torturing them. The instant I learned what sex was that got added to the fantasies. I considered: 'Aren't rape fantasies really common? I probably have the normal kind where people like to role-play stuff.' And then I reconsidered: 'But the idea of it being with someone who's into it completely ruins the appeal. The only thing that's interesting about this scenario is hurting people, and that's horrible.' I went in circles like that analyzing all of the specifics of my fantasies and trying to find a non-evil explanation for them, and couldn't.

So, starting then, I began identifying as Evil. It's a part of my identity to this day.

The difference is that I didn't particularly see that as a bad thing. Okay, yeah, evil people exist! Obviously! But I was also raised religious, and specifically in a religion that teaches about universal salvation and forgiveness. I somehow completely missed the memo on religious guilt. If God made me this way, then I am what I am, and I'm no worse than anyone else who was born funny. I never acted on those fantasies, and I even took steps to make sure that I never would*. Yeah, I'm evil, but that doesn't affect the rest of my life. Evil people still have to do the laundry. They can still volunteer at bake sales. I loved the book "Anatomy of Motive", and it was funny how of the serial killers and rapists in that book, there were some who were gross creeps and some who seem like they'd have been likeable and fun to talk to. Honestly, you can talk to a serial killer ever day and like it as long as you never find out. The difference between me and them was that I was never actually hurting anyone. And if all people, even bad people, are deserving of Salvation, why wouldn't they also be deserving of, like, going to the coffee shop and having a croissant?

This attitude of mine got repeatedly vindicated and ended up worked into my political beliefs. I never stopped being interested in abnormal psychology and I never stopped studying criminal behavior, so I was researching. I came to the same conclusions you did, honestly. To use a less charged example, even if you think that alcohol is morally wrong to drink, you have to agree that Prohibition did nothing to prevent alcohol from being consumed and caused a ton of violence and gang activity. That's true of a lot of things: you have lower instances of STDs and teen pregnancies when you teach sex ed younger, there are lower rates of drug addiction in places where safe use centers exist, et cetera. I believed in Evil People who were Just Bad, but they were rare, and it's stupid to legislate around them. It's like you said: censorship does more harm than good even IF some people are fundamentally bad and exploring their evil in fiction. On the rare instance you find someone who is both Evil and Doing Harm, you deal with them personally. Don't punish normal people because of them. In fact, the easiest way to keep and Evil Person from doing harm is by making it much easier for them to satisfy their urges without hurting others (ex. through fiction) than to do it in the real world where real people are.

(*I was really into psychology, so I knew that suppressing intrusive thoughts usually makes them worse. Instead, every time I caught myself fantasizing about a real person, I would start intentionally fantasizing about a fictional character instead. I would also make the situations in my head outlandish enough to be irreplicable. I figured there's no temptation to do something that can't happen anyway.)


--

Anyway, surprising nobody, I am no longer particularly religious and I no longer believe that some people are just bad. I still think a lot and write a lot about hurting people, but the difference between the real world and fiction is that real people would get hurt! I want to hurt people, but I don't want people to end up hurt in the process! I want the action, but not the consequence, and you can't have the consequence without the action! It turns out that as much as I'm an Evil person, I'm also kind of a Good one, and when it comes to making decisions about my hobbies Good wins out every time without contest.

Kink and porn communities, as well as proshippy fandom communities like this one, have made it very easy to live with my intrusive thoughts and urges. It's funny, because OTNF is right: when people aren't in the habit of talking about their sexual fantasies, you never know what's normal, whereas smut writers who write rape fantasies are a dime a dozen in sex hobby circles.

On the other hand, it does keep surprising... y'know. everyone else. I had a therapist one time ask me "Are you sure you weren't sexually abused as a child?..."

As far as I can tell, you and I are the same person, with one exceptions: you can point to those evil people as other, whereas I was one of them. You're talking about the big conflict where you agree with anticensorship political beliefs, don't understand how people can just accept evil. Well, I had to accept evil because I was evil. I had to accept evil like a person who lives next to a quarry has to accept the sound of heavy machinery. I had to accept evil like a person with ADHD has to accept overstimulation. Turns out it's pretty easy if you get used to it. The real surprise is learning that it's harmless.

I still identify as Evil. It's fun and funny to me. Believing in fundamental good and evil was an important part of my culture, and believing that you could be Evil without being particularly bad remains formative to how I live my life. For example, suppose Satan Himself decided to run for president on a platform of maximizing culpable guilt. Well, things like crimes of poverty and stuff don't count, so you have to make sure everyone has their needs taken care of so that they don't rely on churches for support, can afford all of the hard drugs they want, and get to have lots of consequence-free sex. Satan runs for president on a platform of universal healthcare, UBI, safe housing, plenty of access to good food, et cetera.

In that situation, I vote for Satan Himself. He's probably torturing people in the basement of the Whitehouse, but I'm pretty sure the current guy is, too.

olderthannetfic:

One doesn’t hear about sadistic fantasies as often because even people who’ve accepted that rape victim fantasies are not a problem are often super hung up on rapist/torturer/etc. fantasies. But, of course, fantasies from this other side are also commonplace and just as banal and unremarkable as all the other ones that freak people out.

A lot of religious shit seems to not only make everyone’s intrusive thoughts worse by attempting to suppress them but also promotes a very anti-free will model of behavior. To have an urge is to be unable to resist an urge. It’s nonsense. You can perfectly well choose to do or not do a thing. You might be afraid of the consequences. You might decide it’s too much effort. You might think it’s wrong even if you’d enjoy it. You might think the urge is literally just an intrusive thought and you wouldn’t even enjoy the thing if you did it. Infinite variety.

As a kid, I couldn’t walk past the damn knife block without picturing hurting myself with the knives. Thanks, brain. Luckily, I didn’t attach much importance to it.

I find the notion of objective Good™ and Evil™ in that sense to be rather silly, but I also wasn’t raised religious. But like you, I find that an interest in fairly out-there things forces one to confront this issue in a way that having really tame kinks doesn’t.

alpha0shadow:

Bolaire…

If you are lying with that Nat 20 about how you feel about Halandil “Helen of Troy of Dol-Makjar” Fang, I will never forgive you

freshprinceofhalaire:

What if I was a part in a play and stepped out of my role, but only started becoming a person when I saw your play. What if you and your art and your children’s art were the most important thing in the world to me? What if your friendship was the most important thing in the world to me?

canadiankazz:

image

Hell yeah 🤘

invisiblewitchfromthevoid:

I continue to be fascinated by the Halovars. I really like the Photarch, she’s awful but every time she opens her mouth I’m just so entertained. She really said to her grandson “At your age I had managed to create my own magic child, emprison a feral celestial (and transformed that into a profit) & I created my own religion/bible”.

Grandma girlbossed in such a way that despite the horrors I’m still impressed.